Tuesday, 28 February 2012

Does Job 9:9 Refer to A'isha? A Source Correction

Editorial correction: An earlier version of this article claimed that Job 9:9 referred to A'isha, Umar ibn al-Khattab and Uthman ibn Affan. That claim is not supported by the Hebrew text. This revised article explains the reading and the errors in the earlier argument.


What does Job 9:9 say?

The Hebrew names in the verse are עָשׁ (ash), כְּסִיל (kesil), and כִימָה (kimah), followed by a phrase meaning the chambers of the south. Bible translations commonly identify these with the Bear, Orion, the Pleiades and the southern sky.

The NET Bible's notes acknowledge uncertainty about the precise star or constellation intended by ash. That uncertainty does not establish a reference to A'isha or to any other historical person.

Where the earlier argument went wrong

The earlier article described the first word as ayish, with three consonants. Job 9:9 instead has ash; ayish occurs in Job 38:32. Similarity between a transliterated word and a person's name is not enough to establish that the verse predicts that person.

The third name is kimah, not the kiyd used in the earlier article's argument about calamity. The identification of Umar and Uthman therefore depended on an incorrect reading as well as an unsupported interpretation.

The reference to the south does not itself identify Arabia or turn the preceding names into three people. The verse describes God's creative power. Its astronomical vocabulary and context must be considered before any proposed historical interpretation.

Conclusion

Job 9:9 cannot be cited as evidence that the Bible names or condemns A'isha, Umar or Uthman. Any argument about their actions must rest on relevant historical sources, assessed on their own merits.

Sources: Hebrew text and word analysis of Job 9:9 (https://biblehub.com/text/job/9-9.htm); NET Bible translation and translator notes (https://classic.net.bible.org/passage.php?passage=Job+9:9).

6 comments:

  1. "since it is obvious that the two figures to follow Aisha are the second Khalifah Umar and the third Khalifah Uthmaan."

    I don't get it, how did you reach this conclusion?

    The third figure is referred to Kiymah http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=Job&c=9&v=9&t=KJV#conc/9, which refers to a constellation of stars http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=H3598&t=KJV


    Who are you trying to fool here?

    You know you are stretching the meaning of the verse very desperately right? Right?

    ReplyDelete
  2. A brother has contacted the website and has informed us regarding the objection in the link.

    Quote

    "since it is obvious that the two figures to follow Aisha are the second Khalifah Umar and the third Khalifah Uthmaan."

    This was referenced to A'isha representing the first usurper Aboo Bakar. Now concerning the objection in the email from the link Samuel Bagster's Hebrew-English Lexicon gives the root of cimah as cum and not camah, which of course is what first comes to mind to someone who does not know Hebrew well. Even modern Hebrew dictionaries define c'sil as "fool, dunce, Orion." Better information is found in lexicons than in biased Christian commentators.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Shias are the worst.. even worse than Hasedeen jews..

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete